Showing posts with label Ph.D.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ph.D.. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
PhD Reform?
Attention has been drawn to doctoral education in the popular media lately. An article and blog post in University Affairs call for PhD reform in Canada, prompted by the release of exclusive date on completion rates and times to completion that have not been published elsewhere. While this data is not comprehensive, representing only eight of the 15 top research-intensive universities- none of them identified, it helps to create a picture, of what has been termed elsewhere the ‘crisis’ in doctoral education.
This data, provided by a group of the country’s leading research-intensive universities, known as the U-15, shows that of a 2001 PhD cohort, 55.8% of those in humanities, and 65.1% of social science students completed their programs, compared to 78.3% in the health sciences and 75.4% in the physical sciences. Times to completion were also highest in these disciplines, with humanities students taking, on average, 18.25 terms, or just over six years, and those in social science programs averaging 17 terms.
This data substantiates earlier research that found that fewer than half of those who start a doctoral program in the humanities and social sciences actually graduate; these faculties have the lowest completion rates at both the master’s and doctoral degree levels. Doctoral students in these fields of study are also reported to have the longest times to completion, with averages hovering around 77 months, according to statistics released by the Canadian Association of University Teachers.
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Graduate Student and Faculty Trends from the CAUT Almanac
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
The PhD Movie
The PhD Movie, based on PhD Comics, is being screened tonight at Memorial University. The trailer, along with a screening schedule, can be found here.
Monday, August 1, 2011
A Profile of Graduate and First-Professional Students in the U.S.
A new report was recently released by the U.S. department of education; prepared by the National Center for Education Statistics. The report draws on data from the 2007-08 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study and takes a look at the enrolment characteristics of graduate and first-professional students, when they started their programs, how they combined school and work; the costs of attending, and the sources used to pay for their education, including amounts provided. Highlighted key findings from the report include the following:
* About 65% of all graduate/first-professional students were enrolled in master’s degree programs (31% in education). 15% were enrolled in doctoral programs (60% in a PhD program); 9% were in first-professional programs (51% were in law).
* Students in MBA programs and master’s or doctoral programs in education were more likely to have delayed enrolment in graduate education after completing their undergraduate degrees, to work full time, and to be enrolled part time, compared to medical, health science and law students who tended to be enrolled full time and within two years of earning a Bachelor’s degree, and not work full time,
* Average total costs of full time, full year attendance ranged from $28,400 for a Master’s degree program at a public institution to $52,500 for a first-professional program at a private non-profit institution.
* 91% of doctoral students received some type of financial aid. Doctoral students (except for those in education) were most likely to receive grants and the least likely to take out loans; borrowing was more common amongst first-professional students than master’s or doctoral students. Education doctoral students received financial aid less commonly than other doctoral students; relied solely on loans more commonly than Ph.D. students in other fields.
The full report can be found here:
* About 65% of all graduate/first-professional students were enrolled in master’s degree programs (31% in education). 15% were enrolled in doctoral programs (60% in a PhD program); 9% were in first-professional programs (51% were in law).
* Students in MBA programs and master’s or doctoral programs in education were more likely to have delayed enrolment in graduate education after completing their undergraduate degrees, to work full time, and to be enrolled part time, compared to medical, health science and law students who tended to be enrolled full time and within two years of earning a Bachelor’s degree, and not work full time,
* Average total costs of full time, full year attendance ranged from $28,400 for a Master’s degree program at a public institution to $52,500 for a first-professional program at a private non-profit institution.
* 91% of doctoral students received some type of financial aid. Doctoral students (except for those in education) were most likely to receive grants and the least likely to take out loans; borrowing was more common amongst first-professional students than master’s or doctoral students. Education doctoral students received financial aid less commonly than other doctoral students; relied solely on loans more commonly than Ph.D. students in other fields.
The full report can be found here:
Monday, July 25, 2011
An Overeducated Populace
Recently, The New York Times devoted a special issue to graduate school. Among the advice columns and opinion pieces, an article titled “The Master’s as the New Bachelor’s” takes a look at credential inflation and the difficult task facing new university graduates of marketing their degree to potential, often disinterested employers. According to Debra W. Stewart, president of the Council of Graduate Schools, a master’s level education is quickly becoming the entry degree in many professions. Partly responsible for this trend is the fact that increasing numbers of graduates are returning to school at the graduate level, a common reason for this was the recent economic downturn. The high numbers of job applicants with multiple degrees is leaving employers with little choice but to use education as a way of sorting through applications, and those with graduate degrees come out on top. Rising in popularity in the U.S. is the professional science mater’s degree, which combines job specific training with business skills, and demonstrates a shifting focus towards professionalizing degrees and “learning for the real world”. This trend is spreading beyond the master’s degree to the Ph.D. level, and humanities departments are being urged to get on board. People are frequently heard joking that soon one will need a Ph.D. for the most mundane of jobs, but at what point will universities and society at large determine that enough is enough?
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Funding Issues for International PhD Students at Canadian Universities
According to Western News, six philosophy Ph.D. students at the University of Western Ontario have recently raised concerns about funding for students who take more than four years to complete the degree. Western guarantees funding for all doctoral students for four years, or five for those who have been admitted directly from a n undergraduate program. This benchmark is based on criteria set by the Ontario Ministry of Training, Colleges, and Universities’ (MTCU). As a result of recent federal policy changes, international student applicants who formerly qualified for the Federal Skilled Worker program will not longer be eligible. These changes restrict international students from applying for permanent residency status while on a study permit, and those students who do not complete their degree within four years risk being deported. Previously, PhD students who qualified for permanent residency status could pay domestic tuition fees, which at Western are less than half of what international students pay. It is being argued that this is not only an international issue. Both Canadian and international students sometimes require more than four years to complete the Ph.D. But while Canadian students are eligible for government funding programs such as the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), international students are not. The Associate Dean of Research for the Faculty of Arts at Western notes that there has been an issue of slow completion that the university is working to improve. Nonetheless, Western, along with other Canadian universities, has brought its concerns about the policy revisions to the federal government.
Sunday, April 3, 2011
Canadian Graduate School Enrolments Continue to Rise, but Women Still Lag Behind at Doctoral Level
A recent article in The Gateway, the official student newspaper at the University of Manitoba, discusses gender equality at the highest levels of education, noting the fact that women still lag behind men in doctoral enrolments. At U of M, women outnumber men in doctoral programs in a number of disciplines, including medicine and architecture. It is a very different picture if we look at engineering and the hard sciences, however, where women are least represented. The article makes reference to a recent report released by Statistics Canada, which examines trends in doctoral program enrolment, earned doctorates, and university faculty, with a focus on gender.
According to that report, women accounted for 58% of undergraduate and 56% of master’s program enrolments in 2008/2009, while accounting for 47% of doctoral enrolments. Women also accounted for 44% of doctoral degrees granted in 2008. Female doctoral graduates represented the majority of earned doctorates in four fields: education; social and behavioural sciences, and law; health, parks, recreation and fitness; business, management and public administration. Women are least represented in architecture, engineering and related technologies; and mathematics, computer and information sciences, accounting for less than 30% of earned doctorates in each of these two fields.
According to data made available from Statistics Canada that is complied yearly and included in the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) Almanac of Post-Secondary Education in Canada, women accounted for 50.2% of full-time doctoral enrolments in the 2005-2006 academic year; this is the only time that women have outnumbered men in enrolments at this level. Full-time doctoral enrolments have risen by roughly three-quarters in the last ten years, but the enrolment of women in doctoral programs has only risen by a little less than 3% over this period; in fact enrolment has decreased in the last three years by 3% from the 50.2% accounted for in 2005 to 47% reported in 2008. Meanwhile, women’s full-time master’s program enrolments have exceeded the enrolment of men for quite some time; have steadily risen by a little over 3% since 1998.
According to that report, women accounted for 58% of undergraduate and 56% of master’s program enrolments in 2008/2009, while accounting for 47% of doctoral enrolments. Women also accounted for 44% of doctoral degrees granted in 2008. Female doctoral graduates represented the majority of earned doctorates in four fields: education; social and behavioural sciences, and law; health, parks, recreation and fitness; business, management and public administration. Women are least represented in architecture, engineering and related technologies; and mathematics, computer and information sciences, accounting for less than 30% of earned doctorates in each of these two fields.
According to data made available from Statistics Canada that is complied yearly and included in the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) Almanac of Post-Secondary Education in Canada, women accounted for 50.2% of full-time doctoral enrolments in the 2005-2006 academic year; this is the only time that women have outnumbered men in enrolments at this level. Full-time doctoral enrolments have risen by roughly three-quarters in the last ten years, but the enrolment of women in doctoral programs has only risen by a little less than 3% over this period; in fact enrolment has decreased in the last three years by 3% from the 50.2% accounted for in 2005 to 47% reported in 2008. Meanwhile, women’s full-time master’s program enrolments have exceeded the enrolment of men for quite some time; have steadily risen by a little over 3% since 1998.
Monday, March 21, 2011
Sociologists Find Fault with NRC’s Doctoral Rankings
According to an article on today’s Inside Higher Ed, sociologists are not happy with the National Research Council’s (NRC) doctoral rankings. Six months ago, the NRC released it’s much-anticipated and much delayed doctoral rankings report (see an earlier post here), but critique quickly followed suit. Much of the criticism pertained to the methodology and/or the data. Now the American Sociological Association (ASA) has released an analysis of the assessment. Among a number of concerns that were raised, fault was found with issues such as the exclusion of books and book citations as methods for evaluating faculty productivity in the social sciences, disregard for the quality of journal article publications, the lack of distinction between single-authored and co-authored papers, and the judging of admissions quality by GRE scores alone, ignoring verbal scores, which are a significant measure for American sociology departments. There is a concern that these rankings could have a negative influence on people’s perceptions of departments ranked lower than their actual quality and may lead to pressure to change programs to improve their rankings. The ASA’s report can be found here.
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Doctoral Student Satisfaction
A recent article, entitled "Doctoral Student Satisfaction: An Examination of Disciplinary, Enrollment, and Institutional Differences", published in the journal, Research in Higher Education, examines data from the 2000 National Doctoral Program Survey (NDPS) to gain insight into the differences in satisfaction levels of doctoral students across academic disciplines and institutional types. Interestingly, no significant differences were found in the overall satisfaction of students across disciplines or institutional types (research extensive and intensive universities). Students were less satisfied with the support they received to pursue careers outside of academia, as well as the amount of information (or lack thereof) they received at the start of their program on time-to-degree and post-graduation placement assistance. Education and humanities students in particular were less satisfied than expected with regards to issues related to financial resources, support, and information; students at research intensive universities were less satisfied than expected with training preparation or guidance for academic careers. Not surprisingly, former students were generally less satisfied with their advisor and doctoral experience; students who had been formerly enrolled in humanities, physical science, social sciences, and life sciences programs were even more dissatisfied.
The findings of this study emphasizes the importance of institutional and departmental support for doctoral students, the need for graduate program assessments, further research into the factors that contribute to doctoral student attrition, and the experiences of students enrolled at less prestigious institutions.
The findings of this study emphasizes the importance of institutional and departmental support for doctoral students, the need for graduate program assessments, further research into the factors that contribute to doctoral student attrition, and the experiences of students enrolled at less prestigious institutions.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Ph.D. Placement Statistics
There has been some recent discussion at Princeton University about Ph.D. statistics. This editorial published in The Daily Princetonian, commented on the need for graduate schools at research universities to release information on the placement of their Ph.D. graduates into academic positions to potential graduate students. Unfortunately, few schools release these statistics, although it is argued that these statistics help students to consider their options with regards to a career path- an important decision considering the job market today. The fact of the matter is that while most Ph.D. students in the social sciences and humanities are encouraged to enter academia, few will find opportunities for employment upon graduation. This reality, and the disillusionment that accompanies it, is evidenced by websites about dropping out of graduate school, such as SellOutYourSoul.com, and Leavingacademia.com. The editorial further notes that a recent report released by the National Research Council, discussed in an earlier blog, did not include data on graduate placement because of the difficulty encountered in trying to obtain it from institutions. A recent column, written in response to the earlier editiorial, says that schools should strive to provide more than just placement stats; information on completion and time-to-degree in Ph.D. programs should also be made available.
Thursday, January 13, 2011
Socializing Doctoral Students for Professional Careers
A recent column in the Chronicle of Higher Education claims that Ph.D. programs are neglecting graduate student’s professional development, and the author, English professor, Leonard Cassuto, calls for the incorporation of seminars that address this topic into graduate program coursework to educate students about the culture of the profession. A part of this education involves preparing graduates for careers outside of academia.
From the column:
It amounts to this: Graduate school is professional school, but most Ph.D programs badly neglect graduate students' professional development. We spend years of their training ignoring that development, and then, only at the last moment when students are about to hit the job market, do we attend to their immediate professional needs. By neglecting their career goals, we allow their desires to coalesce from their immediate surroundings—the research university—and to harden over time.
From the column:
It amounts to this: Graduate school is professional school, but most Ph.D programs badly neglect graduate students' professional development. We spend years of their training ignoring that development, and then, only at the last moment when students are about to hit the job market, do we attend to their immediate professional needs. By neglecting their career goals, we allow their desires to coalesce from their immediate surroundings—the research university—and to harden over time.
Monday, January 10, 2011
Canadian Doctoral Graduates, Class of 2005: Where are they now?
A report was recently released by Statistics Canada, entitled, “Expectations and Labour Market Outcomes of Doctoral Graduates from Canadian Universities.” Data for the report was drawn from two sources- the Survey of Earned Doctorates (SED), and the National Graduates Survey (NGS). In summary, two concerns are raised about doctorates in Canada: the number being produced; how doctorate holders (graduates) are employed in this country. With regards to the first concern, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) reports that Canada lags behind other developed countries in the production of doctoral degrees. In 2005, about 4,200 candidates earned a doctorate degree in Canada- approximately one tenth the number awarded in the United States in the same year (43,400). While differences in population size and number of institutions are not accounted for, this is still concerning.
A related concern that is noted in the report is where graduates live and work after completing the doctorate. Slightly more than a quarter of 2005 doctorate graduates (about 27%) moved out of Canada upon completion of their degree and many still resided in the United States two years after graduation. However, 24% of those who moved to the United States after graduation in 2005 had returned to Canada by 2007, and many others were still planning to return. Slightly more than one out of ten 2005 doctoral graduates (12%) were living in the United States in 2007. About seven out of ten graduates who lived in the United States in 2007 (69%) moved for work-related reasons. The majority of those who moved (9 out of 10) had a job awaiting them. However, more than eight out of ten graduates living in the United States in 2007 (83%) intended to return to Canada.
Of those graduates of Canadian universities who are employed in this country, fewer are employed by the private sector than in other countries. Employment rates were found to vary according to field of study; graduates from the humanities reported the highest unemployment rate at 16%. The median income for doctoral graduates in 2007, two years after graduation, was $65,000. While women accounted for 46% of doctoral graduates in the class of 2005; an increase of 11 percentage points compared to their proportion in the class of 1995, across all fields of study, men were paid a median income of $65,000 compared to $61,000 for women. Approximately one in five graduates(19%) said they were overqualified, compared to 30% who reported that less than a doctoral degree was needed to obtain the job they were in. The majority of graduates (56%) were employed in educational services; with most working in a university (87%).
It would be interesting to know what current attrition rates are. What is needed is a longitudinal study examining the total number of students enrolled in first year doctoral studies in a given year, following up at several points to determine the number who complete, average time-to-degree, as well as the number that do not complete. Differnces between institutions and disciplines could be analyzed; comparisons made with American data.
A related concern that is noted in the report is where graduates live and work after completing the doctorate. Slightly more than a quarter of 2005 doctorate graduates (about 27%) moved out of Canada upon completion of their degree and many still resided in the United States two years after graduation. However, 24% of those who moved to the United States after graduation in 2005 had returned to Canada by 2007, and many others were still planning to return. Slightly more than one out of ten 2005 doctoral graduates (12%) were living in the United States in 2007. About seven out of ten graduates who lived in the United States in 2007 (69%) moved for work-related reasons. The majority of those who moved (9 out of 10) had a job awaiting them. However, more than eight out of ten graduates living in the United States in 2007 (83%) intended to return to Canada.
Of those graduates of Canadian universities who are employed in this country, fewer are employed by the private sector than in other countries. Employment rates were found to vary according to field of study; graduates from the humanities reported the highest unemployment rate at 16%. The median income for doctoral graduates in 2007, two years after graduation, was $65,000. While women accounted for 46% of doctoral graduates in the class of 2005; an increase of 11 percentage points compared to their proportion in the class of 1995, across all fields of study, men were paid a median income of $65,000 compared to $61,000 for women. Approximately one in five graduates(19%) said they were overqualified, compared to 30% who reported that less than a doctoral degree was needed to obtain the job they were in. The majority of graduates (56%) were employed in educational services; with most working in a university (87%).
It would be interesting to know what current attrition rates are. What is needed is a longitudinal study examining the total number of students enrolled in first year doctoral studies in a given year, following up at several points to determine the number who complete, average time-to-degree, as well as the number that do not complete. Differnces between institutions and disciplines could be analyzed; comparisons made with American data.
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Doctorate Degrees Granted in U.S. Reach Record Levels
According to a recent article in the International Herald Tribune-the global edition of the New York Times, the number of doctorate degrees granted by American Universities has reached the highest level ever recorded: 49,562 students in the 2008-09 academic year; an increase of 1.6% over the 2007-08 year. The stats are provided by the National Science Foundation's Survey of Earned Doctorates. Some of the findings were as follows:
-In 2009, 67.5% (33,470) of doctorates went to students in science and engineering (S&E), 13,593 of whom were women- a 4.8% increase over 2008. The number of men earning these degrees declined slightly.
-The number of doctorates awarded in non-S&E fields increased from 2008-2009 for both men (1.2%) and women (0.8%).
-The number of doctorates earned by international students declined- by 3.3% in science and engineering; and 4.6% in other disciplines.
The full report can be found here.
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
So You Want to Get A Ph.D. in the Humanities?
This video, mocking those in pursuit of a humanities doctorate, has been circulating on a number of sites (Inside Higher Ed; The Valve) this week.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
U.S. Doctorate Program Assessment
Yesterday the National Research Council released a report entitled A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States. According to the report brief, this assessment consists of data on over 5,000 doctoral programs in 62 fields at 212 universities, and includes "information on faculty research productivity, institutional support for students, and the diversity of faculty and students, among many other characteristics."
The assessment provides data for each program on 20 characteristics, which were collected from the academic year 2005-2006 through questionnaires sent to doctoral faculty, as well as heads of doctoral programs, administrators, and students. Information on characteristics such as publications and citations came from public sources and uses a considerably longer timeframe.Data on these 20 characteristics also served as the basis for the illustrative rankings included in the assessment.The report also offers illustrative ranges of rankings for each program on three separate dimensions of doctoral education- research activity, student support and outcomes, and diversity.
Finally, the report examines findings and trends in doctoral education. Some interesting points are as follows:
-The number of students enrolled has increased in engineering (4%) and in physical sciences (9%) but declined in the social sciences (-5%) and humanities (-12%).
-On average programs in all fields have experienced a growth in the percentage of female students. The smallest growth (3.4%) was in the humanities fields, which were already heavily female, while the greatest growth (9%) was in engineering - to 22% overall.
-Over 50% of students complete their degree in six years or less in the agricultural sciences and in engineering. In the social sciences 37% complete in six years or less, while the same percentage of humanities students complete by eight years.
-The majority of students in the five fields surveyed for the report (chemical engineering, physics, neuroscience, economics, and English) were "very satisfied" or "somewhat satisfied" with the quality of their program. Over 60% in most fields felt they benefited from the program's intellectual environment, but only 40% or less of were satisfied with the program-sponsored social interaction.
According to the news release, the assessment is designed to help universities evaluate and improve the quality of their programs and to provide prospective students with information on the nation's doctoral programs.
Further information, and a download of the full report, can be accessed here.
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Global Perspectives
A lucky group of Ph.D. students at Virginia Tech recently had the chance to explore higher education systems abroad, traveling to Switzerland and Italy as participants in a program that offers insights into higher education and the professoriate on the global scale. According to this article, the 13 graduate students from Blacksburg, Virginia were joined by seven counterparts from Universität Basel in Switzerland to participate in Global Perspectives, an interdisciplinary program developed by Karen DePauw, vice president and dean of graduate education at Virginia Tech.
“Global Perspectives enables graduate students to examine differences in academic practices worldwide and to develop innovative and effective approaches that foster international awareness and education,” said David Kniola, assistant director of Virginia Tech’s Office of Academic Assessment and a coordinator of the program.
As part of the program, students from Universität Basel traveled to the United States to visit several universities. The Virginia Tech Ph.D. students who participate in Global Perspectives are funded by the university’s Graduate School.
“Global Perspectives enables graduate students to examine differences in academic practices worldwide and to develop innovative and effective approaches that foster international awareness and education,” said David Kniola, assistant director of Virginia Tech’s Office of Academic Assessment and a coordinator of the program.
As part of the program, students from Universität Basel traveled to the United States to visit several universities. The Virginia Tech Ph.D. students who participate in Global Perspectives are funded by the university’s Graduate School.
Monday, September 6, 2010
Employment After the Ph.D.
According to Times Higher Education, a study of doctoral employment carried out for Research Councils UK found that less than 2% of those with a PhD were out of work three years after completing their doctorates.While more than half (54%)are employed outside the academy, 94% say they use their research skills in their work and about 40% say they carry out research “most of the time”.
Research was presented today at the Vitae researcher development conference; in a report on the findings, What Do Researchers Do? Doctoral Graduate Destinations and Impact Three Years On, Vitae says that doctoral graduates had established careers in sectors including healthcare, engineering and finance.It is concluded that highly skilled workers are critical to the UK's economic and social well-being.
This information may come as a surprise to those who have been warned of the lack of opportunities and fear the job search after graduating, but it could be misleading. Further information on what positions these Ph.D.'s are filling would be interesting to know.
Research was presented today at the Vitae researcher development conference; in a report on the findings, What Do Researchers Do? Doctoral Graduate Destinations and Impact Three Years On, Vitae says that doctoral graduates had established careers in sectors including healthcare, engineering and finance.It is concluded that highly skilled workers are critical to the UK's economic and social well-being.
This information may come as a surprise to those who have been warned of the lack of opportunities and fear the job search after graduating, but it could be misleading. Further information on what positions these Ph.D.'s are filling would be interesting to know.
Monday, August 30, 2010
Russian Ph.D. Programs
There has been talk of increasing the period of graduate study in Russia from 3 to four years. This proposal has been justified in part due to the fact that some disciplines, such as the technical and natural sciences require mandatory experimental validation of the theoretical results.
From Inside Higher Ed:
The idea behind that proposal is that it should significantly improve the quality of dissertations and the quality of academic training. This proposal is consistent with international practice, where dissertations can take 4-5-6 years. More importantly, the current situation really needs to be improved – drop-outs are high and the average level of research associated with doctoral theses is quite low. However, many people believe that increasing program length, by itself, is unlikely to change anything, and that the problem is not too little time, but extremely poor financial support for such studies and work. Indeed, the basic post-graduate scholarship –currently about $50 a month – doesn’t allow students to focus entirely on research since they must seek some part-time or even full-time job to support themselves. The sad result is that most of PhD students devote too little attention and effort to their dissertation. Only 26% of graduate students finally submit their thesis and the quality (generally) is rather weak. Additionally, since PhD degrees are prestigious, there is a large demand for degree holders and this status is easily bought and sold. So the PhD degree does not necessarily reflect strong training or a sophisticated academic qualification anymore (This situation is most disastrous in the social sciences).
The Russian government also recently announced increases in graduate scholarships starting this September. This comes at the cost of reducing the number of graduate students.
From Inside Higher Ed:
The idea behind that proposal is that it should significantly improve the quality of dissertations and the quality of academic training. This proposal is consistent with international practice, where dissertations can take 4-5-6 years. More importantly, the current situation really needs to be improved – drop-outs are high and the average level of research associated with doctoral theses is quite low. However, many people believe that increasing program length, by itself, is unlikely to change anything, and that the problem is not too little time, but extremely poor financial support for such studies and work. Indeed, the basic post-graduate scholarship –currently about $50 a month – doesn’t allow students to focus entirely on research since they must seek some part-time or even full-time job to support themselves. The sad result is that most of PhD students devote too little attention and effort to their dissertation. Only 26% of graduate students finally submit their thesis and the quality (generally) is rather weak. Additionally, since PhD degrees are prestigious, there is a large demand for degree holders and this status is easily bought and sold. So the PhD degree does not necessarily reflect strong training or a sophisticated academic qualification anymore (This situation is most disastrous in the social sciences).
The Russian government also recently announced increases in graduate scholarships starting this September. This comes at the cost of reducing the number of graduate students.
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Internationalizing Graduate Programs
This blog post has been a work in progress for some time, as more and more has been written on the topic in recent weeks, and I have found myself doing a lot of reading and thinking on the matter. At a time when the job market for new Ph.D.’s is particularly dismal, especially in the United States, there seems to be increasing attention and interest in recruiting and training international scholars, not just graduate students, but top researchers as well.
A recent article discusses the rise in the number of international students admitted to American graduate schools, according to a report recently released by the Council of Graduate Schools (CGS). Findings of the report are based on the most recent surveys conducted by the CGS. Interestingly, admissions offers made to international students increased by 3% in the past year, while offers to Americans fell 1%. China leads, with a 16% increase in admissions offers. While there was a 9% increase in graduate applications among American students in the survey, the number of offers remained the same at doctoral institutions, and went down 6% at master’s institutions. While the report cautions that these figures are probably not final for American students, due to late admissions, I admit I find these numbers a little disturbing, although not surprising. At Canadian universities, too, the number of international graduate students admitted continues to rise, as the number of domestic graduate students admitted decreases.
This past spring, the Government of Canada announced its first group of Canada Excellence Research Chairs. This program awards each of the chairholders- who are selected among the world’s top researchers, and their research teams, up to $10 million over seven years. The chairs’ research is to focus on the four priority areas outlined in the Government of Canada's science and technology strategy: environmental sciences and technologies; natural resources and energy; health and related life sciences and technologies; and information and communications technologies. Another recent initiative is the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships program, which aims to attract and retain the world’s best doctoral students. Canadian and international students are eligible to be nominated for a scholarship, which is valued at $50,000 per year for three years.
An article by Amit Chakma, president and vice-chancellor of the University of Western Ontario, discusses some of Canada’s recent initiatives to attract he world’s best researchers, and the benefits of such programs. Chakma cites the obvious benefits of recruiting the best and brightest from abroad, but claims that we should be doing even more. He only briefly acknowledges the need for similar financial incentives that would enable Canadian students to study abroad; he cites a recent study conducted by Queen’s University that found that less than 3% of Canadian undergrads venture overseas. While I suspect that number may be higher for graduate students, this is a concern. Internationalizing the academic experience is a needed change to the insularism that currently prevails. Too many students in North America are either ill-informed or not supported, due in part to issues such as faculty ignorance and cost. More initiatives like the Canada-U.S. Fulbright Program, which provides educational exchange opportunities for graduate students, faculty, professional and independent researchers, are needed.
Memorial University has recently initiated the Professional Skills Development Program for international graduate students.According to the dean of Graduate Studies, this program includes 7 weeks of workshops focusing on topics such as preparing a curriculum vitae, and job interview preparation, as well as community/service learning and networking opportunities. There are now plans to extend the program and its services to other students. Perhaps increased opportunities for Canadian graduate students to study and conduct research abroad will be a part of these services, and similar programs will be implemented at other Canadian universities.
This article emphasizes the importance of understanding different educational systems and how having that international experience can be seen as an asset when applying for academic jobs. Those advising students need to be aware of global opportunities and to share this information. While supporting international students is certainly commendable, and their recruitment is important to achieving and maintaining a sustainable workforce, I feel there is a lot left to be done to support Canadians students at both undergraduate and graduate levels of study; to make international exchange programs a more viable option for those looking to expand their cultural and educational experiences.
A recent article discusses the rise in the number of international students admitted to American graduate schools, according to a report recently released by the Council of Graduate Schools (CGS). Findings of the report are based on the most recent surveys conducted by the CGS. Interestingly, admissions offers made to international students increased by 3% in the past year, while offers to Americans fell 1%. China leads, with a 16% increase in admissions offers. While there was a 9% increase in graduate applications among American students in the survey, the number of offers remained the same at doctoral institutions, and went down 6% at master’s institutions. While the report cautions that these figures are probably not final for American students, due to late admissions, I admit I find these numbers a little disturbing, although not surprising. At Canadian universities, too, the number of international graduate students admitted continues to rise, as the number of domestic graduate students admitted decreases.
This past spring, the Government of Canada announced its first group of Canada Excellence Research Chairs. This program awards each of the chairholders- who are selected among the world’s top researchers, and their research teams, up to $10 million over seven years. The chairs’ research is to focus on the four priority areas outlined in the Government of Canada's science and technology strategy: environmental sciences and technologies; natural resources and energy; health and related life sciences and technologies; and information and communications technologies. Another recent initiative is the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarships program, which aims to attract and retain the world’s best doctoral students. Canadian and international students are eligible to be nominated for a scholarship, which is valued at $50,000 per year for three years.
An article by Amit Chakma, president and vice-chancellor of the University of Western Ontario, discusses some of Canada’s recent initiatives to attract he world’s best researchers, and the benefits of such programs. Chakma cites the obvious benefits of recruiting the best and brightest from abroad, but claims that we should be doing even more. He only briefly acknowledges the need for similar financial incentives that would enable Canadian students to study abroad; he cites a recent study conducted by Queen’s University that found that less than 3% of Canadian undergrads venture overseas. While I suspect that number may be higher for graduate students, this is a concern. Internationalizing the academic experience is a needed change to the insularism that currently prevails. Too many students in North America are either ill-informed or not supported, due in part to issues such as faculty ignorance and cost. More initiatives like the Canada-U.S. Fulbright Program, which provides educational exchange opportunities for graduate students, faculty, professional and independent researchers, are needed.
Memorial University has recently initiated the Professional Skills Development Program for international graduate students.According to the dean of Graduate Studies, this program includes 7 weeks of workshops focusing on topics such as preparing a curriculum vitae, and job interview preparation, as well as community/service learning and networking opportunities. There are now plans to extend the program and its services to other students. Perhaps increased opportunities for Canadian graduate students to study and conduct research abroad will be a part of these services, and similar programs will be implemented at other Canadian universities.
This article emphasizes the importance of understanding different educational systems and how having that international experience can be seen as an asset when applying for academic jobs. Those advising students need to be aware of global opportunities and to share this information. While supporting international students is certainly commendable, and their recruitment is important to achieving and maintaining a sustainable workforce, I feel there is a lot left to be done to support Canadians students at both undergraduate and graduate levels of study; to make international exchange programs a more viable option for those looking to expand their cultural and educational experiences.
Friday, August 13, 2010
Actor Chooses Ph.D. Over Career
American actor James Franco has been accepted to Yale University to pursue a Ph.D. in English. Apparently, he claims that education is his true passion, and he has chosen this path despite a successful acting career. Franco's latest film is Eat Pray Love, starring Julia Roberts and based on the book by Elizabeth Gilbert. He received a MFA from Columbia,completed an undergraduate degree from UCLA, and also studied film at NYU.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)