Steps Forward in Graduate Education

The Council of Graduate Schools (CGS) has released a new document entitled "Steps Taken on the Path Forward", which reviews the impact of "The Path Forward: The Future of Graduate Education in the United States", a report released in April 2010 that addresses issues and challenges of graduate education. The Path Forward was developed by the Commission on the Future of Graduate Education, a joint initiative of the CGS and Educational Testing Services (ETS) and drew a connection between the country's "need for a highly trained workforce to drive innovation and competitiveness" and the strengthening of the current graduate education system. That system is struggling, much like the Canadian system, with changing demographics, poor degree completion rates, and competition in the higher education sector. Two initiatives were proposed to support graduate education: a COMPETES doctoral traineeship program that would provide financial support to students in areas "of national need"; and a grant program to provide partial funding for the creation of new, and revision of existing, master's degree programs.

This new document outlines outcomes and impacts of the report to three stakeholders: higher education, policymakers, and business leaders. Perspectives were shared at the CGS Legislative Forum. According to the news release, the report has been responsible for a number of advances, such as the following:
• Influenced critical decision processes by helping to shape institutional strategic plans and goals for graduate
education programs;
• Changed institutional priorities by highlighting the importance of graduate education, the report resulted in
making graduate fellowships the top priority for one institution’s fundraising;
• Created new communication channels, such as catalyzing new online discussions between deans and faculty about
graduate education issues and development of a video aimed at clarifying career pathways for students;
• Shaped evaluation metrics and affirming the commitment of graduate deans to developing and using outcome
measures and offering more information to prospective and current students;
• Introduced new programs, particularly professional development programs for graduate students.

While the Canadian system of higher education is quite different from that of its neighbours to the south, it is not immune to the problems identified in these reports; what is concerning is that these current and potential issues are not generating the same sort of discussions that they should be.